Info
Featured In
Media Badges

by

The NY criminal defense attorneys and former Manhattan prosecutors at Saland Law PC have handled a significant number of Desk Appearance Tickets (DATs) and “pink” summonses for our clients. In Manhattan, these cases are often dealt with at 100 Centre Street, 346 Broadway (“pink” ticket / summons court) or at Midtown Community Court. Whether the summons or Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) charges you with Shoplifting Petit Larceny (NY PL 155.25 or NY PL 165.40), Marijuana (NY PL 221.10), Drug Possession (NY PL 220.03), Theft of Services (NY PL 165.15), Assault (NY PL 120.00), Trespass (NY PL 140.10), or even Disorderly Conduct (NY PL 240.20), the ramifications of mishandling the Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) is no different than if you were arrested, booked and put through the criminal justice system. That means, you can still end up with a criminal record even though you were merely given a “ticket” for a criminal act.

For the purpose of today’s entry, I will discuss the differences between the potential Manhattan courts that deal with these charges. Again, a Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) or “pink ticket” summons in Manhattan is returnable to 100 Centre Street, Midtown Community Court or 346 Broadway.

Continue reading

by

New York white collar crimes are found in all different shapes and sizes. From misdemeanor to felonies and from crimes involving individuals to large multi-party schemes, Mortgage Fraud, pursuant to New York Penal Law sections 187.05, 187.10, 187.15, 187.20 and 187.25, is one of the growing areas of white collar crime. Although not as common as “regular” Mortgage Fraud, a crime associated with real estate transactions and this particular offense is Fraudulent Disposition of Mortgaged Property pursuant to New York Penal Law section 185.10.

NY PL 185.10, Pursuant to Fraudulent Disposition of Mortgaged Property:

Continue reading

by

According to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., Marvell Scott, a former WABC newsman and sportscaster in New York, has been arrested and indicted by a New York County Grand Jury for the alleged rape of a runaway 14 year old girl.

It is alleged that Scott, who recently left the world of television to focus on his medical studies, paid a possible pimp to take a 16 year old and 14 year old to his apartment after meeting them in Times Square. It is further claimed that Scott raped the 14 year old girl as the 16 year old was present in the bedroom.

Continue reading

by

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has announced the arrest of David Cohen, the owner of seven popular Manhattan (New York County) clothing stores including Mystique Boutique (547 Broadway, 324 Fifth Avenue, and 412 Broadway), Madness Boutique (305 Canal Street), Exstaza (491 Broadway) and Amsterdam (454 Broadway and 365-367 Canal Street). Beyond the arrest, AG Cuomo is seeking $1.5 Million in unpaid wages and damages due to Mr. Cohen’s alleged scheme of failing to pay proper wages to his employees and failing to report proper taxes.

A defiant AG Cuomo stated:

Continue reading

by

According to Brooklyn (Kings County) District Attorney Charles Hynes, Robert Delvicario, Lennox Johnson, Shanda Bruce and Thermine Remy, and three corporations, Adonis Abstract LLC, LBW Corporation, and Robo Capital Securities, Inc., have all been indicted by a Grand Jury for crimes including, Enterprise Corruption, Mortgage Fraud, Grand Larceny, Identity Theft, and Falsifying Business Records. Prosecutors began the investigation into the defendants after the unsolved 2008 murders of attorney Mark Schwartz and his wife Christina Petrowski.

According to the District Attorney’s Office, it is alleged that “between 2006 and 2009, the defendants participated in a series of financial and real estate scams in order to steal and launder money from the clients of Schwartz’ law firm, as well as clients of Adonis Abstract.” The total amount of these alleged frauds exceeded $1 million.

Continue reading

by

As a New York criminal defense attorney and former Manhattan prosecutor I have represented and prosecuted a significant amount of people for DWI / DUI crimes including Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL) sections §1192.3, §1192.2 and §1192.1. On occasion, an accused asserts that they in fact were not “driving” the vehicle and, therefore, are not guilty of these offenses. While there may be merit to such a defense, where do courts stand on this issue not as a defense at trial, but as it relates to probable cause for the police to make the initial arrest? In other words, if you were merely warming up in the vehicle with the engine running, but not moving or “operating” it otherwise, would the police have probable cause to arrest you once they approached your vehicle, smelled the alcohol, etc.? While each case requires its own unique analysis, a Suffolk County District Court (a similar level court to a New York City Criminal Court that handles misdemeanors), recently addressed this issue.

In People v. Ciccone, 2008SU50102, the accused was charged with Operating a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs in violation of New York State VTL §1192.3. In that case, the police officer observed the defendant’s vehicle on the shoulder of the road. When he approached, the officer observed the defendant sleeping in the driver’s side with the engine running. Knocking on the window, the officer smelled alcohol on the defendant’s breath once the window was lowered and the defendant woke up. After that, the officer observed numerous other signs of the accused’s alleged intoxication and ultimately arrested him.

Continue reading

by

Cyrus Vance, Jr., the District Attorney of New York County (Manhattan), has announced one of what will likely be numerous changes to the office run by Robert Morgenthau since the early 1970s. According to a press release issued by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, District Attorney Vance has created the Major Economic Crimes Bureau. In doing so, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office is combining both the Frauds Bureau and Investigation Division Central (IDC). Richard Weber, currently the Chief of the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) of the United States Department of Justice, will be the lead prosecutor and chief of the newly created bureau.

Both the Frauds Bureau and IDC, formerly called DANY (District Attorney New York) Over Seas, is staffed by exceptionally experienced and seasoned prosecutors. Although IDC has had more involvement in international crimes and has had some of the largest settlements and forfeitures in recent history, both of these bureaus already were at the forefront of white collar prosecutions. Now, the Major Economic Crimes Bureau will specialize in prosecutions relating to securities, commodities, and investment fraud, mortgage fraud and financial institution fraud commercial, bribery and kickbacks, bank fraud, structured investment schemes, internet fraud, international money laundering and terror financing.

Continue reading

by

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr. announced the arrest and indictment of Steven Mandala, a former stockbroker with the Maxim Group and Merrill Lynch. According to the District Attorney’s Office, Mr. Mandala stole $780,000 from Merill Lynch after he allegedly told Merrill Lynch that he was not only a partner at Maxim Group (he was merely an employee stockbroker making $100,000), but that he was in charge of managing $300 million of clients’ assets. As a result of his work with Maxim Group, prosecutors allege that Mr. Mandala claimed he generated $1.5 million in revenue. Due to Mr. Mandala’s claims, alleged “improvements” to his resume, and his assertion he was compensated in the neighborhood of $765,000 a year by Maxim Group, Merrill Lynch hired the stockbroker and advanced Mr. Mandala $780,000. As a result of his chicanery, which was somewhat less successful, Mr. Mandala was charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, Money Laundering in the Second Degree, Identity Theft in the First Degree, Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree and Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.

Despite Mr. Mandala’s alleged claims that he managed $300 million and generated $1.5 million in revenue, it is alleged that Mr. Mandala not only rarely went to work, but that he brought in only $20,000 in new business. During he approximately two months as an employee at Merrill Lynch, it is alleged by prosecutors that Mr. Mandala deposited the $780,000 into his parents’ account and purchased a Ferrari under his father’s name. Mr. Mandala’s employment came to an end when he allegedly sent an email to Merrill Lynch indicating that he was not only resigning, but that all his personal effects should be discarded.

Continue reading

by

It is very easy in New York State to compound a bad mistake and inadvertently roll it into a felony case. To find an example of this, one needs to look no further than the Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law 155.30(4) and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fourth Degree pursuant to New York Penal Law 165.45(2). These two statutes address the theft and possession of stolen debit and credit cards and are “E” felonies punishable by up to four years in state prison.

Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, New York Penal Law 155.30(4):

Continue reading

by

Criminal defense attorneys and lawyers throughout New York City regularly deal with the various crimes relating to and degrees of Assault found in Article 120 of the Penal Law. The most common, Assault in the Third Degree ( New York Penal Law 120.00), is a misdemeanor offense punishable by up to one year in jail. A more serious crime, Assault in the Second Degree (New York Penal Law 120.05), is a felony offense punishable by up to seven years in state prison. Although it will be discussed further below, one of the more common reasons why an intentional misdemeanor Assault in the Third Degree is “elevated” to a felony Assault in the Second Degree is because a “dangerous instrument” is used during the commission of the lesser crime. While there are various legal reasons to raise the level of the crime, where that basis is the use of a “dangerous instrument,” the actual injury inflicted for the misdemeanor and felony level crime is no different. As will be explained below, if you punch someone in the eye and give him a black eye that swells shut you may face the misdemeanor crime. If you do the same thing, but use the heel of your shoe, a baseball bat or even the door of your car, your crime may be elevated to a felony because your use of a “dangerous instrument.” With this in mind, I will first deal with the applicable definitions of the crimes of Assault in the Third and Second Degrees as well as what constitutes a “dangerous instrument.” Once that is done, I will address a few court decisions that have addressed when an instrument is considered “dangerous” under the law and, as a result, and individual had his or her misdemeanor Assault charge raised to a felony offense.

NY PL 120.00(1) – Assault in the Third Degree

Continue reading

Contact Information
52 Duane St 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Office: 212.312.7129Fax: 212.918.9375
By appointment only
50 Main St #1000
White Plains, NY 10606
By appointment only
254 S Main St #500
New City, NY 10956
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Saland Law PC
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design