New York Criminal Lawyer Blog

July 15, 2011

Jeremy Saland Interviewed in Wall Street Journal Article About the Use of Social Media in Lawyer Marketing

Jeremy Saland, a New York criminal defense attorney and former Manhattan prosecutor, was interviewed for a Wall Street Journal article published today addressing the intersection of modern day lawyering and social media. An interesting article, one of the main themes of the piece was how social media – blogs, twitter and facebook – can help an attorney’s marketing and client generation.

Make no mistake. If done the right way, utilizing social media can certainly help drive business to your law practice. The article made this very clear. However, equally important in generating business over time is not only getting the phone to ring, but to be able to service your clients and to do so ethically and diligently. After all, establishing a career that will span decades is not about merely getting a high profile case or one “big fish” client, but in assisting all clients in all matters with the highest degree of professionalism.

July 15, 2011

Oscar Fuller, the One Punch Bandit, and Second Degree Assault: A New York Criminal Lawyer’s Analysis of a Potential Overcharge

by Jeremy Saland

Oscar Fuller, the man accused by prosecutors of obliterating the petite Lana Rosa with one punch, was arraigned on an indictment charging Assault in the Second Degree in Manhattan Supreme Court earlier this April. According to District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., what began as a dispute over a “trivial matter – a parking spot – turned into a vicious and senseless act of violence with dire consequences.”

While I do not believe anyone can credibly argue that Ms. Rosa, who recently awoke from a coma after fracturing her skull, was not hurt catastrophically, legal minds can certainly debate whether or not DA Vance made the wrong (or right) charging decision in this case. Make no mistake, DA Vance had “no choice” but to present this matter to a Grand Jury. If he did not present the case to the Grand Jury, the jury of public opinion would not embrace the top prosecutor well. If the case was presented to the Grand Jury and they did not indict, then DA Vance could always explain that he must respect the process whether he agreed or not with the outcome. Regardless, the Manahttan District Attorney’s Office is now saddled with proving a one punch felony that may not merit such a prosecution based on the actions of the accused as opposed to the end result.

July 10, 2011

James Whittemore Fails to Make Letterman’s Top Ten After Allegedly Trashing Ed Sullivan Theater: Criminal Charges & Potential Punishment

by Jeremy Saland

James Whittemore, the twenty-something Manhattan man arrested for an alleged drunken rampage at the fabled Ed Sullivan Theatre in New York City, is going to a get a sobering reality check when he sees a criminal court judge for the first time. It is alleged by police that Mr. Whittemore trashed the Ed Sullivan Theatre be smashing out windows and tossing garbage pails and other items around David Lettermen’s home stage. While not as disturbing as the crimes perpetrated by Robert Halderman, the actions of Whittemore certainly have left the gapped toothed comedian unhappy to say the least.

Assuming the reports are true, what are the potential crimes that young James may face? As I note in most of my blog entries, I am only privy to the facts set forth in the media, but the following are some of the more serious criminal offenses I believe may be charged based on the limited information that I have:

July 7, 2011

New York Identity Theft Crimes: Can One Perpetrate Identity Theft in NY Where Permission is Given to Use Personal Identifying Information

by Jeremy Saland

As a prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for over seven years, I supervised and led investigations, arrests, indictments into complex identity theft and fraud related crimes and schemes. One of those investigations and indictments resulted in the conviction of numerous individuals who posed as professional graduate school entrance examination test-takers. These defendants created fake passports and use the identification information of the legitimate prospective student to sit for the GMAT, GRE, TOEFL and other examinations. Indicted for the crimes of Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument, Falsifying Business Records and Identity Theft, none of the attorneys who represented the accused challenged the crime of Identity Theft based on the theory that their respective client was given permission and authority by the legitimate student to use that student’s personal information to cheat the colleges and universities. If nothing else, the idea that one cannot commit identity theft because one was given permission to use the personal information, albeit to defraud a third party, was worth pursuing in a court of law in light of the other overwhelming evidence. While other crimes may have been perpetrated, an argument could have been made that Identity Theft was not one of them.

Generally, you are guilty of Identity Theft in New York (New York Penal Law 190.78) in New York when, with the intent to defraud, you present yourself as another person by using that person’s personal identifying information. In doing so, also obtain goods, money or some other form of property. This crime is enhanced through the value of the property or goods, as well as through other means to the crimes of New York Penal law 190.79 and New York Penal Law 190.80.

July 5, 2011

Report: Manhattan DA to Dismiss Charges Against Dominque Strauss-Kahn

by Jeremy Saland

Dominque Strauss-Kahn, the French national and former head of the IMF, may be celebrating his own Independence Day accompanied with a display of fireworks that would revival any July 4th celebration. According to the New York Post, DSK could “walk” as early as his next court date after Manhattan prosecutors have come to realize there are major credibility issues with the maid from the Sofitel. Not only would a dismissal call into questions the zealousness of prosecutors who rushed into the Grand Jury to obtain an indictment, but the grand finale could have both political and financial ramifications for many parties involved. The encore to this international spectacle would be the consequences of a perceived gaffe on public confidence.

According to the New York Post, a source familiar with the investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office stated that “[W]e all know this case is not sustainable. Her credibility is so bad now, we know we cannot sustain a case with her.” If recent stories and articles can be believed, this revelation by DA Cyrus Vance’s team seems reasonable. There have been reports in various media sources that the maid’s conversations with an inmate on Rikers were recorded where it was learned that she was seeking to benefit financially from the arrest. Furthermore, allegations that the maid was “servicing” DSK voluntarily and has done so or has tried to to so with other customers recently came to light. If these claims were not enough, reports have further asserted that the maid had numerous accounts with significant deposits that could be tied to “improper” activities. Should have or could have prosecutors known this before heading into the Grand Jury? I do not know the answer, but this may only be the beginning of what appears to be an exoneration and vindication for DSK and a significant blemish for the fabled Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

July 4, 2011

Drunk Driving Crimes in New York: VTL 1192(4) Driving While Impaired by Drugs

by Jeremy Saland

While not as commonly seen by DWI lawyers in the New York City area, Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192(4), Driving While Ability Impaired Drugs, is no less serious than an arrest for any other DWI or DUI crime. Having said that, those attorneys not experienced in New York’s drunk driving and drinking and driving laws can further the misinformation about this offense. The following blog entry will address some of the issues and elements of this crime. As always, please remember that this blog entry is no substitute with an in depth consultation with your own New York criminal lawyer.

The Elements of VTL 1192(4) – Driving While Ability Impaired Drugs

June 29, 2011

An Undeserved Rap: Raymond Velasquez Charged with Reckless Endangerment & Other Crimes in NYC Court

by Jeremy Saland

Make no mistake. 34 year old wannabe rapper, Raymond Velasquez, is a little past his “aspiring” years, but deserves some credit for his energy and ambition. While his arrest for disrupting NYC traffic and intentionally disregarding the police may not be worth the attention he has brought upon himself, prosecutors in Cyrus Vance’s Manhattan District Attorney’s Office may have been equally ambitious in their charging decisions. Certainly, it appears that Mr. Velasquez, aka, “CI Joe” was disorderly and there is a strong argument that he trespassed when he climbed the utility pole, but is the Alicia Keys lover boy guilty of Reckless Endangerment?

According to New York Penal Law section 120.20, one is guilty of Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree when he or she acts so recklessly that his or her conduct creates a substantial risk (not just any risk) of serious physical injury (not just any injury). Now, digging a little deeper, let’s examine some critical definitions here. First, “substantial” is obviously more likely than a mere “chance” or “possibility.” More importantly, “serious physical injury,” according to the New York Penal Law, is not just any injury, but one that could cause death.

June 29, 2011

Voiding an Arrest in a New York Shoplifting, Weapon or Drug Case: NY CPL 170.55 & the ACD “Nullity”

by Jeremy Saland

Often times, prosecutors in the New York City area (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens and Westchester Counties) offer first time shoplifters as well as those accused of other thefts, weapon crimes and personal drug possession, a violation of Disorderly Conduct (New York Penal Law 240.20). Depending on the facts and circumstances, a “Dis Con” could be a tremendous disposition. However, such a violation does have its draw backs. One of the most common is that a Disorderly Conduct may seal, but may show up on a background check. The other issue with a Disorderly Conduct is that while you will not have to ever state you were convicted of a crime, you technically have been arrested. Therefore, should an employer or an employment application ask whether you have ever been arrested, you will have to answer in the affirmative.

As I have written time and time again (and fought for my clients in each and every case of this nature), it is often worth one’s time to reject a Disorderly Conduct and fight for an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal or ACD. In these cases, not only is there no conviction of any kind, but the case is both dismissed and sealed in six to twelve months depending the nature of the underlying offense. Another benefit that is often not addressed is equally important.

June 24, 2011

Is Merely Entering and Exiting a Building Five Minutes Later Enough to Establish Probable Cause for a Trespass Arrest in New York

by Jeremy Saland

When all the criminal laws in New York are reviewed, Trespassing in the Third Degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law section 140.10, certainly is not one of the more complex laws. Having said that, it does not mean that complex legal issues will not arise for both New York criminal defense attorneys or prosecutors. Generally, one is guilty of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree when he or she knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building and that property or building is fenced in, enclosed in a manner to exclude intruders or is a public housing project with the rules “conspicuously posted.” Not a complete list of all means where one can be charged with Trespassing, the question posed in this entry is whether or not merely entering and exiting a housing project after five minutes is sufficient to establish the basis to ultimately stop, question and arrest a person. Fortunately, a Brooklyn Criminal Court judge recently answered this question.

In People v. Ortiz, 2010KN086039, NYLJ 1202495789148, a police officer accused a young woman of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree. After going through the arrest and trial process, the case proceeded to hearings where a judge determined whether or not probable cause existed to arrest the accused.

June 18, 2011

Can Prosecutors in New York Use the BAC Breath Test Taken at the Scene of a DWI Arrest Against You at Trial

by Jeremy Saland

In New York City it is routine that an arrest for DWI, DUI or driving while intoxicated is accompanied by an on the scene intoxilyzer or BAC breath test. In other words, before you ever meet with your criminal lawyer or are handcuffed in the back of a police car, officers with the NYPD will administer an intoxilyzer test in the field. Although prosecutors, and DWI lawyers, often cite the results of this test to their advantage when possible, the legal question is as follows:

Can a breathilyzer or intoxilyzer test result be taken at the scene of a DWI arrest be used against an individual charged with a New York DUI crime such as VTL 1192.2 (Driving While Intoxicated) or VTL 1192.2-a (Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated)?